What are the difficulties of proving and punishing a sentimental fraud?

This article aims to analyze the difficulties of proving and punishing the crime of sentimental embezzlement. Contemplating jurisprudential decisions, this article has as its qualitative methodology what is developed through bibliographic research and document analysis carried out from keywords such as Sentimental Embezzlement, Responsibility, Principles. In addition, it seeks to understand the applicability of responsibility, both in the civil sphere and in the criminal sphere to understand and thus characterize the conduct of the counterfeiter in affective relationships. In which, economic exploitation is present, observing the claims, such as illicit enrichment and use of bad faith by the swindler. In view of this, it addresses the constitutional principles that have a direct relationship with the theme under analysis and support the personality rights of victims, principles such as the dignity of the human person, the principle of affection and that of good faith. It is sought as a result of the consideration presented here to explain judgments that support and generate a basis so that you can understand the nuances that involve the crime of sentimental embezzlement.